Following Pritchard’s talk, Daniel Duke of Monash University discussed one of the technical challenges in making the transition to the new propellants, namely the need to redesign actuators to accommodate flow differences for 152a and 1234ze compared to 134a. Duke described the development of models that may allow MDI developers to “tune” the design of the nozzle orifice in order to get the desired spray and droplet characteristics when changing propellants.
In his talk on “Carbon footprint impact on inhalers,” Christer Janson of Uppsala University proposed that reducing most MDIs with DPIs and reducing the need for SABAs either by replacing them with ICS/formoterol therapy or by improving asthma control would be a feasible way to significantly reduce carbon footprint, although he acknowledged that some patients would still need to use MDIs.
When asked about the impact of the plastics used in DPI devices, Janson said that he had not considered that factor. Session moderator Omar Usmani pointed out that the a single trip to the hospital for a patient who suffers an exacerbation due to switching to a DPI could wipe out any carbon footprint savings from the switch. In response, Janson cited a need for training patients on how to use the inhalers properly.